http://www.bangkokpost.com/250508_News/25May2008_news10.php

Rice farmers dig in over foreigners' land

Opposition mounts to Saudi venture



By Sunthorn Pongpao & Thai News Agency

The Thai Farmers Association called on concerned agencies yesterday to look into land occupation by foreign businessmen, which has made many of the country's rice farmers landless. ''Vast areas of farmland in the western and northeastern provinces have fallen into the hands of Taiwanese businessmen, while investors from the United States have also bought a number of plots in the fruit-growing province of Phetchabun,'' said association member Wichian Phuanglamchiak.

''Widespread land acquisitions by these foreign landlords has already made a good number of rice farmers landless, forcing them to rent the same land for rice growing from foreigners,'' he said.

His call came in the wake of an alleged plan to support Saudi Arabian businessmen keen on putting their money in rice farming and setting up a joint rice export venture.

The plan has drawn fierce protests from paddy farmers, who fear they will soon end up being landless farmers if foreigners are not stopped from buying more rice growing areas.

The association said yesterday it would write to Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej, asking him to scrap the plan.

The plan is reportedly the brainchild of deposed prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who took a group of Saudi businessmen on a tour of a rice production centre in the Buffalo Village of Chart Thai party secretary-general Prapat Pothasuthon in Suphan Buri on Wednesday.

Agriculture and Cooperatives Minister Somsak Prissananantakul, from the Chart Thai party, also opposes the plan, saying the idea was ''tantamount to selling the nation''.

But Mr Somsak yesterday denied the remark had anything to do with Mr Thaksin.

''I have to apologise to Mr Thaksin if he feels he's been dragged into the dispute for no apparent reason, which might cause him damage,'' said Mr Somsak in Chiang Mai, the hometown of Mr Thaksin.

Chart Thai leader Banharn Silpa-archa said yesterday that Mr Somsak's harsh comment could have resulted from some misunderstandings.

Mr Banharn said Mr Thaksin phoned him before Wednesday's trip, saying he only wanted to show foreigners how rice farming is done in Thailand, and how the sector could be further developed with the help of modern agricultural technology.

Mr Prapat's interview had misled the public into believing that foreign investors were being encouraged by Mr Thaksin to buy up all the paddy fields, he said.

Mr Thaksin's spokesman Pongthep Thepkanjana defended Mr Thaksin yesterday by saying that the former prime minister only wanted to do things he thinks will benefit the nation.

--

At 08:14 PM -0700 05/25/08, Betsy R. Cramer wrote:
It's sad but it's an international issue: few people want to live on a farm in this internet globalized world. I think it is a universal belief that working with one's hands, farming, is inferior to getting an education and a well-paying job in the/a city. That old song, How You Gonna Keep 'Em Down On The Farm After They've Seen Paree?, would apply to Thailand, except maybe it could be rewritten to say, How You Gonna Keep 'Em Down On The Farm After They've Travelled Online and Seen the World Wide Web? It's the ever-present downside of education...... And to get that education and the perceived benefits costs $, and the only capital most have is their land.

At 08:16 AM -0700 05/26/08, Mac Bakewell wrote:
Yes, exactly, except that the families in our hardly atypical village who have either sold or mortgaged their land were influenced more by television, which they've had access to since the arrival of electricity in 1980, than by the Internet, which few adults in rural Thailand have ever seen. Whatever the influence, the families I know who have recently sold or mortgaged their land have reinvested the proceeds in diesel pickups rather than education.

A car is the ultimate status symbol in Thailand and, because of the way vehicles are taxed, diesel pickups are the most affordable option. Trouble is, land is so cheap and vehicles so expensive that the sale or mortgage of a typical family farm yields only enough for a down payment on a $20- $30-thousand Toyota, Nissan, or Isuzu. Thanks in part to a cultural disinclination toward maintenance, this purchase typically leaves the extended family in debt over a shiny new toy that will have depreciated to near zero long before the loan is paid off.

Still, urban migration does seem inevitable. The young people who, with or without education, have already moved to the cities send money home to sustain their parents who are raising the grandchildren in the village. (The long-term social ramifications of these abridged-extended families remain to be seen.) Very few of the young people who have moved away are doing well enough in the cities to enjoy being separated from the social fabric of the village, but many of those who can afford to do so have begun investing in better schooling for their own kids.

Thus rural brain-drain is already a reality, and I'm not sure where this is going to end up. Some farmers, like the outside investors, are astute enough to recognize that agriculture is a potentially profitable enterprise. If such farsighted folks can devise ways to inspire their communities to pool their resources, and to persuade their educated sons and daughters to stay on, then they might not have to watch their villages devolve into company towns.

That hasn't happened in many places in the USA, and it is unlikely that it will in Thailand. Rural poverty is a common factor in both countries, but in terms of cooperative communities some Thai villages come pretty close to the Amish model, which has proven remarkably competitive with corporate farming in the USA.